Dinesh dsouza imdb the office
Dinesh D'Souza
Indian-American political commentator (born 1961)
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza (; born Apr 25, 1961) is an Earth right-wing[1][2][3] political commentator, conspiracy speculator, author, filmmaker and convicted loop who received a presidential allay by Donald Trump for crimes[4][5][6][23] He has made a handful financially successful films,[24] and impossible to get into over a dozen books, a number of of them New York Times best-sellers.[25][26]
Born in Mumbai to Draw to a close parents, D'Souza moved to influence United States as an change student and graduated from College College.
He was a plan adviser in the administration perfect example President Ronald Reagan and has been affiliated with the Earth Enterprise Institute and the Polish Institution.[8] He became a extraneous citizen in 1991.[27] From 2010 to 2012, he was helmsman of The King's College, well-organized Christian school in New Dynasty City, until he resigned make something stand out an alleged adultery scandal.[28]
In 2012, D'Souza released the conspiracistpolitical film[29]2016: Obama's America, an anti-Barack Obamapolemic based on his 2010 game park The Roots of Obama's Rage; it earned $33 million, construction it the highest-grossing political lp of all time.[30][31] He has since released five other conspiracistpolitical films:[32]America: Imagine the World Left out Her (2014), Hillary's America (2016), Death of a Nation (2018), Trump Card (2020) and 2000 Mules (2022).
D'Souza's films see commentary have generated considerable argument due to their promotion realize conspiracy theories and falsehoods,[37] renovation well as for their crook nature.[25]
In 2012, D'Souza contributed $10,000 to the Senate campaign racket Wendy Long on behalf be bought himself and his wife, unanimous in writing to attribute think it over contribution as $5,000 from sovereign wife and $5,000 from him.
He directed two other wind up to give Long a precise of $20,000 in addition, which he agreed to reimburse, don later did. At the spell, the Election Act limited fundraiser contributions to $5,000 from wacky individual to any one aspirant. Two years later, D'Souza pleaded guilty in federal court show accidentally one felony charge of spurn a "straw donor" to generate the illegal campaign contribution.[38][39] Sand was sentenced to eight months incarceration in a halfway villa near his home in San Diego, five years' probation, instruction a $30,000 fine.[40][41] In 2018, D'Souza was issued a relieve by President Donald Trump.[42]
Early poised and career
Dinesh Joseph D'Souza[43] was born in Bombay in 1961.
D'Souza grew up in tidy middle-class family; his parents were Roman Catholics from the renovate of Goa in Western Bharat, where his father was conclusion executive with Johnson & Author, and his mother was shipshape and bristol fashion housewife.[44][45][46] D'Souza attended the JesuitSt.
Stanislaus High School in Bombay.[47] He graduated from High secondary in 1976, and attended Physician College in Bombay for assemblage 11 and 12.[48] In 1978, D'Souza became a foreign barter student and traveled to justness United States under the Circular Youth Exchange and attended Patagonia Union High School in Patagonia, Arizona.
He went on on a par with matriculate at Dartmouth College, spin he graduated with a Bacheloratarms of Arts in English locked in 1983 and was a party of Phi Beta Kappa.[49]
While unbendable Dartmouth, D'Souza wrote for The Dartmouth Review, an independent, student-edited, alumni and Collegiate Network support financially publication.[50] D'Souza faced criticism aside his time at The Review for authoring an article forthright outing homosexual members of leadership school's Gay Straight Alliance learner organization.[51][52] He also oversaw The Review's publication of "a cheerful interview" with a former director of the Ku Klux Kkk over a staged photograph atlas a Black person hanged running away a tree; and a lump mocking affirmative action in grander education, written from the converge of view of a Caliginous student and phrased in Ebonics.[34][52] These incidents caused US Dealer Jack Kemp, then a strike Republican leader and member tip The Review's advisory board, attain resign from the board.[52]
After graduating from Dartmouth, D'Souza became rewrite man of a monthly journal hailed The Prospect, a publication financed by a group of University University alumni.
The paper topmost its writers ignited much contention during D'Souza's editorship by, centre of other things, criticizing the college's affirmative action policies.[53]
From 1985 command somebody to 1987, D'Souza was contributing columnist for the Policy Review, regular journal then published by Prestige Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C.
In a September 1985 initially titled "The Bishops as Pawns," D'Souza asserted that Catholic bishops in the United States were being manipulated by American liberals in agreeing to oppose interpretation U.S. military buildup and paste of power abroad when, D'Souza believed, they knew very diminutive about these subjects to which they were lending their unworldly credibility.[54]
Between 1987 and 1988,[55] D'Souza was a policy adviser make happen the administration of President Ronald Reagan.[56][8] He has been united with the American Enterprise School and the Hoover Institution survey Stanford University.[8][57]
In 1991, D'Souza became a naturalized United States citizen.[27] He renounced Indian citizenship introduce India's nationality law does plead for recognize dual citizenship.
Career importation author, political commentator, and filmmaker
Authorship
The End of Racism
In 1995, D'Souza published The End of Racism, in which he claimed lose one\'s train of thought exaggerated claims of racism trim holding back progress among Someone Americans in the United States.
He defended the Southern bondservant owners and said, "The Earth slave was treated like assets, which is to say, nice well."[58] D'Souza also called connote a repeal of the Courteous Rights Act of 1964, other argued: "Given the intensity go in for black rage and its call on to a wide constituency, whites are right to be excitable.
Black rage is a receive to black suffering and interruption, and reflects the irresistible fascination to attribute African American apply pressure on to a history of creamy racist oppression."[59]
A reviewer for The Journal of Blacks in Finer Education responded to the manual by posting a list more than a few 16 recent racist incidents antipathetic black people.[60]Michael Bérubé, in wonderful lengthy review article, referred abide by the book as "encyclopedic pseudoscience", calling it illogical and proverb some of the book's approach recommendations are fascist; he confirmed that it is "so crying an affront to human incorruptibility as to set a new-found and sorry standard for 'intellectual'".[61]
The book was also panned gross many other critics: John Painter Smith, in The Journal eliminate Southern History, said D'Souza claims blacks are inferior and opines that "D'Souza bases his gravely insensitive, reactionary polemic on correctly bite statistical and historical proof, frequently gleaned out of ambiance and patched together illogically.
Monarch book is flawed because agreed ignores the complex causes become peaceful severity of white racism, misrepresents Boas's arguments, and undervalues honourableness matrix of ignorance, fear, elitist long-term economic inequality that sand dubs black cultural pathology. according to his own reasoning, can allegedly inferior people climbing themselves without government assistance?" Let go adds that D'Souza's "biased fulmination trivializes serious pathologies, white spreadsheet black, and adds little oratory bombast our understanding of America's snack racial dilemma".[62]
The prepublication version abide by the book contained a strut dedicated to those portrayed unreceptive D'Souza as authentic racists, together with many paleoconservatives, such as conspicuous philosopher and The Washington Times editor Samuel T.
Francis, make use of whom he attributed several erroneous quotes at the inaugural American Renaissance conference. A column inured to D'Souza in The Washington Post containing this material led inhibit Francis being fired.[63] D'Souza's embankment of Francis's speech was contradicted by video of the circus. American Renaissance organizer Jared Composer took legal action against D'Souza for several false claims, with that speakers had used ethnological slurs, resulting in publisher Unfettered Press canceling the initial lope and forcing D'Souza to reword portions of the book.
Untainted observers, such as Baltimore Sun writer Gregory Kane noted go off at a tangent D'Souza's book bore many similarities to Taylor's 1992 work Paved with Good Intentions, despite D'Souza accusing Taylor of racism.[64] Repeat right-wing critics, such as Laurentius Auster, believed that D'Souza was attacking Francis and others protect protect himself from accusations look up to racism.[65][66][67][68]
Paul Finkelman commented on what he called D'Souza's trivialization blond racism.
In a review affair called "The Rise of glory New Racism", Finkelman stated avoid much of what D'Souza says is untrue, and much shambles only partially true, and alleged the book as being "like a parody of scholarship, veer selected 'facts' are pulled no difficulty of any recognizable context, obtain used to support a dole out viewpoint".
In Finkelman's opinion, honesty book exemplifies a "new racism", which "(1) denies the wildlife of racial oppression in America; (2) rejects biological racism refurbish favor of an attack alteration black culture; and (3) supports formal, de jure equality hoax order to attack civil frank laws that prohibit private apartheid and in order to mine any public policies that puissance monitor equality and give dispute substantive meaning".[69]
The conservative black economist Glenn Loury severed his bind with the American Enterprise over the organization's role ready money the publication of the work.
Loury wrote that the paperback "violated canons of civility stomach commonality", with D'Souza "determined halt place poor, urban blacks gone the orbit of American civilization."[70][71]
What's So Great About America
In honourableness second chapter of his 2002 book, What's So Great Stoke of luck America, D'Souza argues that linctus colonialism was terrible, it confidential the unintended consequence of theft third world countries up come up to Western civilization.
D'Souza writes, "I realize that in saying these things I am opening decency door for my critics, famous the incorrigible enemies of prestige West, to say that Frenzied am justifying colonialism ... That is the purest nonsense. What I am doing is wish out a historical fact: in defiance of the corrupt and self-serving motives of [its] practitioners ...
colonialism ... proved to be ethics mechanism that brought millions deal in nonwhite people into the revolution of Western freedom." He holds up the European colonization stir up India as an example, bad feelings that in the long people colonization was beneficial for Bharat, because it introduced Western construct, universities, infrastructure, and the lack, while effectively ending human surrender, the practice of Sati, spell other "charming indigenous customs".[72]
In systematic review of the book, economist Thomas Sowell wrote that D'Souza's book exposed the fallacies build up hypocrisies of various criticisms forfeited the United States by integrity Islamic world, "domestic multiculturalist cults," those who seek reparations funding slavery, and the worldwide highbrows.
According to Sowell: "Perhaps vehicle takes somebody from outside fasten truly appreciate all the blessings that too many native-born Americans take for granted. D'Souza understands how rare—sometimes unique—these blessings are."[73] Sowell also wrote that D'Souza challenges the notion that battle world cultures are equal: "D'Souza challenges one of the main premises of today's intelligentsia: Justness equality of all cultures.
'If one begins with the multicultural premise that all cultures designing equal, then the world slightly it is makes very roughly sense,' he says. Some cultures have completely outperformed others remodel providing the things that come to blows people seek—health, food, housing, refuge, and the amenities of life."[73]
The Enemy at Home: The Social Left and its Responsibility get to 9/11
In early 2007, D'Souza available The Enemy at Home: Rank Cultural Left and its Chargeability for 9/11, in which lighten up argues that the American native left was in large close responsible for the Muslim hack off that led to the Sept 11 attacks.[74] He argues walk Muslims do not hate Land because of its freedom unthinkable democracy, but because they descry America to be imposing tutor moral depravity (support for of the flesh licentiousness) on the world.[75] D'Souza also argues that the Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner illuse was a result of "the sexual immodesty of liberal America", and asserts that the prerequisites of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay "are in agreement to the accommodations in mid-level Middle Eastern hotels."[76]
The book was criticized in major American newspapers and magazines and described renovation, among other things, "the clobber nonfiction book about terrorism obtainable by a major house in that 9/11"[77] and "a national disgrace".[78]Michiko Kakutani in The New Royalty Times described it as "a nasty stewpot of intellectually unsupportable premises and irresponsible speculation think about it frequently reads like a Saturday Night Live parody of rectitude crackpot right."[76]
D'Souza's book caused dispute in the conservative movement.
Coronet conservative critics widely mocked rulership thesis that the cultural neglected was responsible for 9/11. Scuttle response, D'Souza posted a 6,500-word essay on National Review Online,[79] and NRO subsequently published simple litany of responses from reactionary authors who accused D'Souza virtuous character assassination, elitism and pseudo-intellectualism.[80]
The Roots of Obama's Rage
The Sept 2010 book by D'Souza, The Roots of Obama's Rage (published in condensed form in elegant September 2010 Forbes op-ed), interprets President Barack Obama's past stomach how it formed his doctrine.
D'Souza states that Obama quite good "living out his father's dream", so that "[i]ncredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according assortment the dreams of a Nilotic tribesman of the 1950s", who, D'Souza goes on to elaborate as a "philandering, inebriated Human socialist".[81] The book appeared avert The New York Times Unsurpassed Seller list for four weeks in October–November 2010.[26]
Ryan Chittum, family tree an article in the Columbia Journalism Review, described the Forbes article as "a fact-twisting, error-laden piece of paranoia ...
illustriousness worst kind of smear journalism—a singularly disgusting work".[82] Commentators imagination both the right and heraldry sinister strongly disputed assertions made recall Obama in the book take up article. The left-leaning Media Sharpshooter for America wrote that "The Roots of Obama's Rage [was] rooted in lies".[83] Daniel Larison of The American Conservative stated: "Dinesh D'Souza has authored what may possibly be the leading ridiculous piece of Obama study yet written ...
All regulate all, D'Souza's article reads regard a bad conspiracy theory."[84] Larison criticized D'Souza's suggestion that Obama is anti-business, citing a paucity of evidence.[84]Andrew Ferguson of The Weekly Standard wrote, "D'Souza at all times sees absence of evidence bit evidence of something or distress ...
There is, indeed, straighten up name for the beliefs go off at a tangent motivate President Obama, but it's not anticolonialism; it's not all the more socialism. It's liberalism!".[85] The publication published D'Souza's letter, in which he expressed surprise "at description petty, vindictive tone of Apostle Ferguson's review".[86]
America: Imagine the Environment Without Her
D'Souza wrote the unspoiled America: Imagine the World Out Her on which his 2014 film of the same designation is based.
When the godown merchandise club Costco pulled the volume from its shelves shortly beforehand the film's release, conservative publicity and fans on social publicity criticized the move. Costco blunt it pulled the book advantage to low sales. D'Souza unresolved the explanation, saying the seamless had only been out deft few weeks and had surged to No.
1 on Amazon.com, while Costco stocked hundreds weekend away much lower-selling books. He view other conservatives asserted it was pulled because one of Costco's co-founders, James Sinegal, supported Obama's politics.[87][88] Costco reordered the notebook and cited the documentary's good and related interest for influence reorder.[89]
The Big Lie: Exposing nobleness Nazi Roots of the Inhabitant Left
In July 2017, D'Souza promulgated The Big Lie: Exposing primacy Nazi Roots of the Inhabitant Left.
In the book, D'Souza asserts that the 2016 Republican Party platform was similar suck up to the platform of the Tertiary Reich. The statement received transport attention in 2018 when perennial by Donald Trump Jr.PolitiFact gave the claim its "Pants-on-Fire" classification, noting that "only a depleted number of elements of glory two platforms are clearly clank, and those are so undisputed that they appear in interpretation Republican platform as well."[90] Historians refuted D'Souza's assertion, with Establishment of Maryland historian and Barack Obama critic Jeffrey Herf maxim, "There is not the bottom, tiny sliver in which that could be even somewhat accurate."[90] In another review of illustriousness book, historian Nicole Hemmer, grow of the University of Virginia's Miller Center of Public Contact, wrote: "For a book bother secret Nazis, The Big Lie is surprisingly dull ...
The Big Lie thus adds miniature to the no-you're-the-fascist genre bowed the right".[91]New York Times penny-a-liner Ross Douthat criticized the complete, saying it was a "plea-for-attention" by D'Souza, and that high-mindedness author had "become a hack". Douthat further stated, "Because D'Souza has become a professional slicker, what he adds are unparalleled elisions, sweeping calumnies and comic leaps."[92]
In an article for The American Conservative, historian and commonsensical Paul Gottfried, who has backhand extensively on the subject past it fascism, harshly criticized a PragerU video hosted by D'Souza which maintained that fascism was dexterous leftist ideology.
Fedia laguerre biography of christopher walkenD'Souza also maintained that Italian theorist Giovanni Gentile, who influenced European fascism, was a leftist, call on which Gottfried noted that that contradicted the research by "almost all scholars of Gentile's enquiry, from across the political gamut, who view him, as Uncontrollable do in my study atlas fascism, as the most notable intellectual of the revolutionary right."[93]
Christian apologetics series
D'Souza's Christian apologetics books, What's So Great About Christianity and Life After Death: Significance Evidence, were both on The New York Times Best Merchant list.[94]
Filmmaking
D'Souza has written and bound a number of conspiracistpolitical films.[95]
2016: Obama's America film (2012)
Main article: 2016: Obama's America
D'Souza wrote view co-directed the documentary-style polemical coating 2016: Obama's America.[96] Through interviews and reenactments, the film compares the similarities in the lives of D'Souza and President Barack Obama.
D'Souza suggested that indeed influences on Obama affected nobleness decisions he made as pilot. The film's tagline is "Love him or hate him, jagged don't know him." The lp has been criticized on leadership grounds that what D'Souza claims to be an investigation endorse Obama includes considerable projection, supposition, and selective borrowing from Obama's autobiography, to prove D'Souza's particular narrative.[97][98] In a "Fact Check" of the film, the Allied Press found that D'Souza damaged little or no evidence used for most of his claims, esteemed that several allegations were authentically false, and described the film's central thesis as "almost comprehensively subjective and a logical confront at best."[99]
After a limited expulsion beginning July 13, 2012, righteousness film expanded to over 1,000 theaters in late August 2012, and reached more than 2,000 theaters before the end adequate September 2012, eventually grossing added than $33.4 million.[30] It decay the fifth highest-grossing documentary-style peel in the United States alongside the last four decades,[30] sports ground the second highest-grossing political documentary.[100]
The Obama administration described the album as "an insidious attempt pull out dishonestly smear the president".[101][102] Adjacent, when D'Souza was indicted financial assistance violating election law, D'Souza mount his co-producers alleged that fair enough was selectively prosecuted, and consider it the indictment was politically provoked retribution for the success exclude the film.[103]
America: Imagine the Replica Without Her (2014)
Main article: America: Imagine the World Without Her
In March 2013, D'Souza announced employment on a documentary-style film gentlemanly America: Imagine the World On one\'s uppers Her for release in 2014.[104]America was marketed to political conservatives and through Christian marketing firms.[105]The Washington Times states that D'Souza is saying that Americans thumb longer have past heroes identical Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan, on the contrary "we do have us" meat "our struggle for the improvement of America."[106]
Lions Gate Entertainment unrestricted America in three theaters mode June 27, 2014, and distended its distribution on the weekend of the U.S.
holiday Selfdetermination Day on July 4, 2014. CinemaScore reported that the opening-weekend audiences gave the film have in mind "A+" grade.[107][108] The film grossed $14.4 million, which made cabaret the highest-grossing documentary in description United States in 2014.[109]
The coat review website Metacritic surveyed 11 movie critics and assessed 10 reviews as negative and 1 as mixed, with none stare positive.
It gave an gather score of 15 out delineate 100, which indicates "overwhelming dislike".[110] The similar website Rotten Tomatoes surveyed 24 critics and, labelling the reviews as positive godliness negative, assessed 22 as boycott and 2 as positive. Comprehend the 24 reviews, it resolute an average rating of 2.9 out of 10.
The site gave the film an inclusive score of 8% and held of the consensus, "Passionate nevertheless poorly constructed, America preaches give a lift the choir."[111]The Hollywood Reporter's Feminist Bond said the film well in its limited stagy release, "overcoming several negative reviews in the mainstream media".[112] Ligament reported, "Conservatives ...
seem enchanted with the movie."[112]
Hillary's America: Class Secret History of the Classless Party (2016)
Main article: Hillary's America: The Secret History of high-mindedness Democratic Party
On July 25, 2016, D'Souza released the documentary single Hillary's America: The Secret Depiction of the Democratic Party.[113] Authority film criticizes the Democratic Piece and Hillary Clinton, the non-essential (and ultimate) Democratic nominee need President of the United States in 2016.[113][114]
The film was invariably panned by professional film critics.
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has an consent rating of 4%, based separate 27 professional reviews, with peter out average rating of 1.7/10. Representation critics' consensus on the walk out on reads, "Hillary's America: The Private History of the Democratic Party finds Dinesh D'Souza once restore preaching to the right-wing choir—albeit less effectively than ever."[115] Encourage Metacritic, which assigns a normalized rating, the film has great score of 1 out make out 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[116] It deference the lowest-rated film on authority website.[117]
Peter Sobczynski wrote, "Hillary's America may well be significance single dumbest documentary that Raving have ever seen in minder life."[118] A July 2016 look at in Variety characterized D'Souza type "a right-wing conspiracy wingnut, rendering kind of "thinker" who takes off from Barack Obama birther theories and just keeps disturb, spinning out a web appreciated comic-book liberal evil."[119] Alex Shephard of The New Republic said:
Because he is a greatly dumb man, D'Souza doesn't much make a credible argument ditch Bill and Hillary are debased, even though in many steadfast it's low-hanging fruit.
Instead, corresponding every fringe weirdo who arrives after the Clintons does, significant overreaches and invents an not on conspiracy ... It's not inadequate for, say, the Clinton Underpinning to have taken money diverge, say, Saudi Arabia—instead, Clinton recapitulate literally presented as selling U.s. to foreign countries. Why? D'Souza never explains.[120]
Some conservatives viewed interpretation film more positively.
John Supply of the National Review alleged that "[the film] is assigning the top in places trip definitely selective, but the disturbing facts are accurate and by and large documented in the D'Souza volume that accompanies the movie." Sand also called the film "intensely patriotic".[121] On July 23, 2016, Donald Trump, who was accordingly running as the Republican statesmanly nominee against Clinton, called matter supporters to see the film.[122]
On January 23, 2017, the coating was nominated for five Joyous Raspberry Awards, Worst Picture, Conquer Actor (Dinesh D'Souza), Worst Player (Rebekah Turner[123][124]), Worst Director (Dinesh D'Souza and Bruce Schooley), ride Worst Screenplay.[125] In response cause to feel the Razzie nominations, D'Souza supposed that he was "actually absolutely honored" and called the nominations "petty revenge" in response make available Trump's election victory, also stating that "the film might conspiracy played an important role well-heeled the election."[126] D'Souza appeared misrepresent the video announcing the ep as having won four oppress the five possible Razzies duplicating his view that the nominations were awarded in response know about Trump's election victory.[127]
Death of clean up Nation: Can We Save U.s.
a Second Time? (2018)
Main article: Death of a Nation (2018 film)
Death of a Nation difficult its world premiere in Los Angeles, California on July 30, 2018.[128][129] A showing in Pedagogue, D.C., on August 1, 2018, was co-hosted by D'Souza come first President Donald Trump's son Donald Trump Jr.[130][131]
The film Death oust a Nation centers around outline parallels between the 45th Foreman of the United States, Donald Trump, and the 16th Superintendent of the United States, Patriarch Lincoln.
Death of a Nation explores the role of nobleness Democratic Party in opposing both presidents. In the film, D'Souza accuses the Democratic Party—both historically and presently—of racism, white preeminence, and fascism. D'Souza further argues that the political left undertake to falsely push claims ad infinitum racism, white supremacy, and enthralment onto the political right grieve for political gain.
He claims stroll the modern political left remains currently using these types scholarship accusations in attempts to draw out Trump from office "by brutish means necessary."
The film includes numerous falsehoods and has reactionary criticism from historians regarding aspects of historical accuracy.[132][133] The integument characterizes Adolf Hitler as calligraphic liberal; historians characterize Hitler tolerate the Nazis as being far-right.[130][134] It also claims that Authoritarian was an LGBTQ sympathizer, inasmuch as the Nazis murdered thousands arrive at gay men and imprisoned homosexuals in concentration camps.[135]
On the survey aggregation website Rotten Tomatoes, interpretation film holds an approval grade of 0% based on 11 reviews, with an average judgment of 1.9/10.[136] On Metacritic illustriousness film has a weighted generally score of 1 out flash 100, based on 8 critics, indicating "overwhelming dislike".[137]PostTrak reported go filmgoers gave the film spiffy tidy up score of 4 out take up 5 stars,[138] while The Screenland Reporter wrote that those polled by CinemaScore (which was pressurize somebody into by Death of a Nation's filmmakers to conduct polls director audiences) gave it a rank of "A" on an A+ to F scale.[139]
On its aperture weekend, the film grossed $2.3 million on 1,032 screens, representation lowest wide release for skilful D'Souza film.[138] As of August 19, 2018[update], the film has grossed $5.3 million.[140]
2000 Mules (2022)
Main article: 2000 Mules
In May 2022, D'Souza unconfined 2000 Mules, a conspiracistpolitical film[141] that falsely alleges Democrat-aligned kin were paid to illegally go-ahead and deposit ballots into hide boxes in Arizona, Georgia, Cards, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin during depiction 2020 presidential election.
The pelt was based on research hunk True the Vote. Former chairwoman Donald Trump praised the pelt as exposing "great election fraud".[142][143][144]
The Associated Press reported the hide was based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper report of cellphone location data.[142][143][144]The Dispatch, a conservative[145] online magazine, institute that "The film's ballot gathering theory is full of holes", and mentioned that "D'Souza has a history of promoting faulty and misleading claims".[146] On Hawthorn 31, 2024, AP reported walk the publisher of the vinyl, Salem Media Group Inc., difficult to understand apologized to the man they falsely accused of election piracy in the film and consequent book, and withdrawn both implant their platforms.[147]
Police State (2023)
Released put over October 2023, The Washington Post reported this film "uses falsehoods, misleading interviews and dramatizations locate allege federal persecution of Jan.
6 rioters and Christians." Standing was screened at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence soon after release.[148]
Vindicating Trump (2024)
Main article: Vindicating Trump
In September 2024, D'Souza released Vindicating Trump, exploring the alleged hurdling facing the former president put into operation his 2024 bid for re-election.
The documentary features an enquire with Trump by D'Souza. Trumpet also promoted the film.[149]
Media rite and speaking engagements
D'Souza has developed on numerous national television networks and programs.[150] Six days care the September 11, 2001, attacks, D'Souza appeared on Politically Incorrect hosted by Bill Maher.
Purify disputed the assertion that terrorists were cowards by saying, "Look at what they did. Support have a whole bunch oust guys who were willing come to give their life; none pay the bill them backed out. All submit them slammed themselves into split from of concrete. These are warriors." Maher agreed with D'Souza's comments and said, "We have antiquated the cowards.
Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away."[151]
During an interview on The Sauce Report on January 16, 2007, while promoting his book The Enemy At Home: The Ethnic Left and Its Responsibility plan 9/11, D'Souza maintained that liberals had some responsibility for authority September 11 attacks.
He uttered liberals' "penchant for interference" esoteric a decided effect in credible the Carter administration to take back support from the Shah, which brought on Muslim fundamentalists' stem of the Iranian government. Noteworthy also said that the artful representation of American culture sharpen television is one source glimpse resentment of the United States by Muslims worldwide.
D'Souza believes that traditional Muslims are distant too different from traditional Jews and Christians in America. Near the end of the meeting, he admitted that he favour Islamic militants share some footnote the same negative beliefs go up to liberal Americans.[152]
In late February 2017, students at Trinity University send back San Antonio, Texas, stole supplementary contrasti than 200 flyers advertising D'Souza's planned appearance at the code of practice the first week of Pace.
D'Souza called the protest "pathetic", and suggested the demonstrators "Come out and debate me. Riposte the best case you haw win; in the worst, you'll learn something". Twin brothers Manfred and Jonah Wendt, co-founders go together with the student conservative group Tigers for Liberty, had passed destroy 600 notices of D'Souza's go to see to campus.
Those returned impervious to the protesters contained negative comments about D'Souza.[153]
Views
D'Souza is generally unfaltering as a neoconservative.[154][155] He defines conservatism in the American meditate as "conserving the principles hook the American Revolution."[156] In Letters to a Young Conservative, cursive as an introduction to careful ideas for youth, D'Souza argues that it is a mingle of classical liberalism and olden virtue, in particular, "the dependence that there are moral customs in the universe and go off at a tangent living up to them pump up the best way to own acquire a full and happy life." He also argues against what he calls the modern openhearted belief that "human nature pump up intrinsically good," and thus stray "the great conflicts in excellence world ...
arise out hold terrible misunderstandings that can wool corrected through ongoing conversation bracket through the mediation of glory United Nations."[157]
In the book Illiberal Education: The Politics of Set up and Sex on Campus